Comments for Louisiana Conservative http://louisianaconservative.com Louisiana Conservative politics Thu, 09 Sep 2010 09:29:05 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2 Comment on Is this Really Such a Big Deal? by hankroberts http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=967#comment-17091 hankroberts Fri, 20 Aug 2010 14:00:42 +0000 http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=967#comment-17091 "now they have to attend to the fear mongering over the Ground Zero mosque." Is the inflammatory language constructive? "Except the proposed mosque and community center is not at ground Zero – it’s several blocks away and a few hundred feet from an existing mosque. It is TWO blocks away (close enough the landing gear from one of the planes damaged the existing building); and if there is already a mosque right there then it begs the question. "Muslims have been praying inside the Pentagon since Sept. 11, but those opposing the Ground Zero mosque have been strangely silent." They have been silent because Muslims exercising their constitutional rights is not the issue here. The fact that you have a right to do something does not make it right to do. "While there may not be a logical foundation for such vehemence — justified or not, it exists." Indeed it does, and that is the reality we must deal with; but I challenge the lack of logical foundation. Throughout our history, at the state and local level, we have opposed and/or prohibited things purely on the basis that they offend the sensibilities, that they engender moral outrage, or that they involve strong negative imagery (real or perceived). No one is opposed to building the kind of facility described: they oppose building it THERE. That indeed involves emotional issues, but that doesn't necessarily make it irrational. "those who hope to lead are spending too much time exploiting ...the mosque placement at the expense of other very pressing issues." False Dilemma: we can do both, and I contend that we should do both. Both are legitimate issues for debate and concern. “now they have to attend to the fear mongering over the Ground Zero mosque.” Is the inflammatory language constructive? “Except the proposed mosque and community center is not at ground Zero – it’s several blocks away and a few hundred feet from an existing mosque. It is TWO blocks away (close enough the landing gear from one of the planes damaged the existing building); and if there is already a mosque right there then it begs the question. “Muslims have been praying inside the Pentagon since Sept. 11, but those opposing the Ground Zero mosque have been strangely silent.” They have been silent because Muslims exercising their constitutional rights is not the issue here. The fact that you have a right to do something does not make it right to do. “While there may not be a logical foundation for such vehemence — justified or not, it exists.” Indeed it does, and that is the reality we must deal with; but I challenge the lack of logical foundation. Throughout our history, at the state and local level, we have opposed and/or prohibited things purely on the basis that they offend the sensibilities, that they engender moral outrage, or that they involve strong negative imagery (real or perceived). No one is opposed to building the kind of facility described: they oppose building it THERE. That indeed involves emotional issues, but that doesn’t necessarily make it irrational. “those who hope to lead are spending too much time exploiting …the mosque placement at the expense of other very pressing issues.” False Dilemma: we can do both, and I contend that we should do both. Both are legitimate issues for debate and concern.

]]> Comment on Speak English or Get Out? Huh? by jimbrownla http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=963#comment-17090 jimbrownla Mon, 09 Aug 2010 01:51:52 +0000 http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=963#comment-17090 Let me answer Olcoot. He says: "If I move to France, I’ll learn French" Good for you. but that's YOUR choice. If you want to live there and speak whatever you want, so what? Who should care? Do your thing, but leave me alone. As long as I obey the law, I should be allowed to learn or not learn any thing I care to. As long as I obey the law, I should be able to speak whatever language I want. Government should leave me alone. Let me answer Olcoot. He says: “If I move to France, I’ll learn French” Good for you. but that’s YOUR choice. If you want to live there and speak whatever you want, so what? Who should care? Do your thing, but leave me alone. As long as I obey the law, I should be allowed to learn or not learn any thing I care to. As long as I obey the law, I should be able to speak whatever language I want. Government should leave me alone.

]]> Comment on Speak English or Get Out? Huh? by Olcoot http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=963#comment-17089 Olcoot Fri, 06 Aug 2010 13:33:47 +0000 http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=963#comment-17089 I also grew up here, a country boy, and knew a few folks who took English as a second language in High School. "We should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the person's becoming in every facet an American, and nothing but an American...There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn't an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag... We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language... And we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people." Theodore Roosevelt, 1907. The illegal immigration problem is a completely separate issue. The issue here is allegiance. If I move to France, I'll learn french; if I move to Italy, I'll learn italian; if I move to Australia, I'll learn to speak whatever it is they speak there (it certainly isn't english!). You move to America, learn the language. I also grew up here, a country boy, and knew a few folks who took English as a second language in High School.
“We should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the person’s becoming in every facet an American, and nothing but an American…There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn’t an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag… We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language… And we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people.”
Theodore Roosevelt, 1907.

The illegal immigration problem is a completely separate issue. The issue here is allegiance. If I move to France, I’ll learn french; if I move to Italy, I’ll learn italian; if I move to Australia, I’ll learn to speak whatever it is they speak there (it certainly isn’t english!). You move to America, learn the language.

]]> Comment on Time to Review Louisiana Criminal Law by Olcoot http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=941#comment-17078 Olcoot Tue, 06 Apr 2010 15:22:05 +0000 http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=941#comment-17078 "What kind of justice is that?" It is exactly the kind we've chosen, when we presume a teenager is not accountable for his actions. A friend told me several years ago, the Judicial System is no longer concerned with Justice: it is concerned with the letter of the law. He was right. Until we do away with notions that certain classes of citizens are not accountable for their actions, and do away with Case Law, which eliminates the ability of a Judge to actually use judgement, this kind of injustice will continue. I think it was Oliver Wendell Holmes who said it is not a court of Justice; it is a court of law. Don't confuse the two. The courts have little to do with Justice and God has little to do with the Law. “What kind of justice is that?” It is exactly the kind we’ve chosen, when we presume a teenager is not accountable for his actions. A friend told me several years ago, the Judicial System is no longer concerned with Justice: it is concerned with the letter of the law. He was right. Until we do away with notions that certain classes of citizens are not accountable for their actions, and do away with Case Law, which eliminates the ability of a Judge to actually use judgement, this kind of injustice will continue. I think it was Oliver Wendell Holmes who said it is not a court of Justice; it is a court of law. Don’t confuse the two. The courts have little to do with Justice and God has little to do with the Law.

]]> Comment on A Step On An Island by avman http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=926#comment-17033 avman Sat, 13 Feb 2010 03:24:32 +0000 http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=926#comment-17033 JBS, I agree with you on the freedoms that we don't have, and it is an infringement of human freedoms to force some to pay for others. When I say government isn't the biggest threat... well, my next post should clarify it. JBS,

I agree with you on the freedoms that we don’t have, and it is an infringement of human freedoms to force some to pay for others.

When I say government isn’t the biggest threat… well, my next post should clarify it.

]]> Comment on A Step On An Island by jbs1717 http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=926#comment-17029 jbs1717 Fri, 12 Feb 2010 14:09:13 +0000 http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=926#comment-17029 I tend to disagree with, at least, some of this. First is the notion of a "free country". Let's use social security as an example. Do you have a choice in participating in social security? No, you do not. If we lived in a "free country" you would have a choice to participate or not to participate. One of these is called freedom, one is called tyranny. This, to me, is what the TEA Party is all about. You could use the same example of SS for welfare, medicare, selective service, etc. In all of these you do not have a choice, that is called tyranny. The TEA Party started with taxes and maybe it has moved to other areas. I can not speak for anyone else but I want less taxes, less government(less tyranny)and more freedom. As of now the only group I know who is preaching this message is the TEA Party. I'm sticking with the TEA Party. So, as you can see I do not believe we live in a "free country". I tend to disagree with, at least, some of this. First is the notion of a “free country”. Let’s use social security as an example. Do you have a choice in participating in social security? No, you do not. If we lived in a “free country” you would have a choice to participate or not to participate. One of these is called freedom, one is called tyranny. This, to me, is what the TEA Party is all about. You could use the same example of SS for welfare, medicare, selective service, etc. In all of these you do not have a choice, that is called tyranny. The TEA Party started with taxes and maybe it has moved to other areas. I can not speak for anyone else but I want less taxes, less government(less tyranny)and more freedom. As of now the only group I know who is preaching this message is the TEA Party. I’m sticking with the TEA Party. So, as you can see I do not believe we live in a “free country”.

]]> Comment on Challanges for new New Orleans Mayor! by jbs1717 http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=923#comment-17028 jbs1717 Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:00:35 +0000 http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=923#comment-17028 Tony Gentile is also running for the senate. Tony Gentile is also running for the senate.

]]> Comment on Challanges for new New Orleans Mayor! by jsanderssr http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=923#comment-17026 jsanderssr Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:16:28 +0000 http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=923#comment-17026 Not surprising that the NFL would support melancon. They are the geniuses who claimed to own "Who Dat" and the Fleur De Lis. Melancon can't have a parade in his own congressional district-if anyone came, they'd throw rocks... Not surprising that the NFL would support melancon. They are the geniuses who claimed to own “Who Dat” and the Fleur De Lis. Melancon can’t have a parade in his own congressional district-if anyone came, they’d throw rocks…

]]> Comment on The Obama Budget by hankroberts http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=921#comment-17017 hankroberts Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:46:42 +0000 http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=921#comment-17017 As Walter Williams frequently points out, this stuff is NOT rocket science: it may not be easy, but it is relatively simple. It is exactly the same principle as personal weight control. Calories in greater than calories out equals weight gain [dollars in greater than dollars out equals budget surplus]: calories out greater than calories in equals weight loss [dollars out greater than dollars in equals budget deficit]. Despite all the squabbling about how to manage that budget problem, there's really a very simple way to resolve the problem: again, not easy, but simple. For every line item in every annual budget, ask the question "What is the constitutional authority for this item?" That question alone would immediately cut the fed budget in half (or more) because a huge portion of that funding has absolutely no constitutional justification. Then ask if the item is necessary to the national interest: that totally eliminates so-called 'pork'. The problem is not that we don't know how to fix the problem: the problem is we don't want to fix it. If we did, we would elect representatives who are committed to solving the problem, and take the hard knocks associated with changing our lifestyles to reach the goal; just like weight control. We can't blame Obama, or Bush, or Democrats, or anyone else: we're here because of our own bad choices. I have a sign that I use in some training I do: "Like what you've got? Want more of the same? Keep doing what you've been doing, don't change anything." As Walter Williams frequently points out, this stuff is NOT rocket science: it may not be easy, but it is relatively simple. It is exactly the same principle as personal weight control. Calories in greater than calories out equals weight gain [dollars in greater than dollars out equals budget surplus]: calories out greater than calories in equals weight loss [dollars out greater than dollars in equals budget deficit].

Despite all the squabbling about how to manage that budget problem, there’s really a very simple way to resolve the problem: again, not easy, but simple. For every line item in every annual budget, ask the question “What is the constitutional authority for this item?” That question alone would immediately cut the fed budget in half (or more) because a huge portion of that funding has absolutely no constitutional justification. Then ask if the item is necessary to the national interest: that totally eliminates so-called ‘pork’.

The problem is not that we don’t know how to fix the problem: the problem is we don’t want to fix it. If we did, we would elect representatives who are committed to solving the problem, and take the hard knocks associated with changing our lifestyles to reach the goal; just like weight control.

We can’t blame Obama, or Bush, or Democrats, or anyone else: we’re here because of our own bad choices. I have a sign that I use in some training I do: “Like what you’ve got? Want more of the same? Keep doing what you’ve been doing, don’t change anything.”

]]> Comment on The BCS President by jbs1717 http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=920#comment-17014 jbs1717 Sun, 31 Jan 2010 16:21:24 +0000 http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=920#comment-17014 I thought the same way when the government was investigating baseball. Our government is totally out of control. We need much smaller government, much lower taxes, and states that stand up for their citizenz rights. I thought the same way when the government was investigating baseball. Our government is totally out of control. We need much smaller government, much lower taxes, and states that stand up for their citizenz rights.

]]> Comment on The Coming Housing Crash Of 2010 by Housing Crisis Beginning To Hit | http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=876#comment-17010 Housing Crisis Beginning To Hit | Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:50:20 +0000 http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=876#comment-17010 [...] December 27th, 2009, we at Louisiana Conservative warned you that there was going to be a housing crisis. While most of the experts were predicting that gas prices will reach $5.00 a gallon in 2008, we [...] […] December 27th, 2009, we at Louisiana Conservative warned you that there was going to be a housing crisis. While most of the experts were predicting that gas prices will reach $5.00 a gallon in 2008, we […]

]]> Comment on Why Gas Will Be $3.00 By Labor Day Part II by Home Crisis Beginning To Hit | http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=564#comment-17009 Home Crisis Beginning To Hit | Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:27:11 +0000 http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=564#comment-17009 [...] gallon in 2008, we did a two article story why gas prices will be $3.00 by Labor Day (Part 1 here, Part 2 here). Though we were wrong about gas prices dropping to $3.00 a gallon by Labor Day, we were right in [...] […] gallon in 2008, we did a two article story why gas prices will be $3.00 by Labor Day (Part 1 here, Part 2 here). Though we were wrong about gas prices dropping to $3.00 a gallon by Labor Day, we were right in […]

]]> Comment on Landrieu Said What?!? by jsanderssr http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=910#comment-17008 jsanderssr Sat, 23 Jan 2010 16:08:46 +0000 http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=910#comment-17008 To the folks who voted in obamasama and kept porky mary in office, thanks a lot! How's that hope and change working out? To the folks who voted in obamasama and kept porky mary in office, thanks a lot! How’s that hope and change working out?

]]> Comment on Will Louisiana Be The First State To Tell The Feds “NO!”? by Louisiana Legislature Floating Bill Making Obamacare Illegal in State - 25 Popular Blogs - Popular Bloggers.com http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=901#comment-17007 Louisiana Legislature Floating Bill Making Obamacare Illegal in State - 25 Popular Blogs - Popular Bloggers.com Sat, 23 Jan 2010 15:17:49 +0000 http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=901#comment-17007 [...] (Hat tip LouisianaConservative.com) [...] […] (Hat tip LouisianaConservative.com) […]

]]> Comment on Will Louisiana Be The First State To Tell The Feds “NO!”? by Louisiana Legislature Floating Bill Making Obamacare Illegal in State by: wth | American Conservative Daily http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=901#comment-17006 Louisiana Legislature Floating Bill Making Obamacare Illegal in State by: wth | American Conservative Daily Sat, 23 Jan 2010 14:13:13 +0000 http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=901#comment-17006 [...] tip LouisianaConservative.com) Contributor's website: http://thenma.org/blogs/index.php/huston Filed Under Conservative [...] […] tip LouisianaConservative.com) Contributor’s website: http://thenma.org/blogs/index.php/huston Filed Under Conservative […]

]]> Comment on Will Louisiana Be The First State To Tell The Feds “NO!”? by State Sovereignty: Louisiana considers nullifying Obamacare « Mayrant&rave http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=901#comment-17004 State Sovereignty: Louisiana considers nullifying Obamacare « Mayrant&rave Sat, 23 Jan 2010 02:21:56 +0000 http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=901#comment-17004 [...] tip LouisianaConservative.com) Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Louisiana Law Would Make Obamacare [...] […] tip LouisianaConservative.com) Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Louisiana Law Would Make Obamacare […]

]]> Comment on Will Louisiana Be The First State To Tell The Feds “NO!”? by IFC News Louisiana Legislature Floating Bill Making Obamacare Illegal in State http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=901#comment-17003 IFC News Louisiana Legislature Floating Bill Making Obamacare Illegal in State Sat, 23 Jan 2010 00:21:15 +0000 http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=901#comment-17003 [...] (Hat tip LouisianaConservative.com) [...] […] (Hat tip LouisianaConservative.com) […]

]]> Comment on The Twilight Zone by jsanderssr http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=909#comment-17002 jsanderssr Thu, 21 Jan 2010 14:48:00 +0000 http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=909#comment-17002 What a shame that the portly mary landrieu isn't up for election for such a long time... What a shame that the portly mary landrieu isn’t up for election for such a long time…

]]> Comment on Senator Kennedy from Louisiana? by jsanderssr http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=906#comment-17001 jsanderssr Thu, 21 Jan 2010 14:46:05 +0000 http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=906#comment-17001 Sure, I remember edmund reggie. He preceded his protege to prison. ted kennedy and edmund reggie-yeah, the country needs the daughter and wife of these two slimeballs in the senate... Sure, I remember edmund reggie. He preceded his protege to prison. ted kennedy and edmund reggie-yeah, the country needs the daughter and wife of these two slimeballs in the senate…

]]> Comment on Will Louisiana Be The First State To Tell The Feds “NO!”? by Louisiana Legislature Floating Bill Making Obamacare Illegal in State | Right Wing News http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=901#comment-16999 Louisiana Legislature Floating Bill Making Obamacare Illegal in State | Right Wing News Wed, 20 Jan 2010 18:17:42 +0000 http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=901#comment-16999 [...] Louisiana State Senator A.G. Crowe (R, Slidell) is introducing a bill for the 2010 legislative session in Baton Rouge that would make Obamacare illegal if it violates state laws, effectively making Obamacare null and void in the Pelican State.Senator Crowe states that his bill "provides that no law or rule shall compel, directly or indirectly, any person, employer or health care provider to participate in any health care system or health insurance."Crowe's proposed Senate Bill (download .pdf file) begins as follows:HEALTH CARE. Prohibits state or local governmental coercion of any Louisiana employer, health care provider, or individual to compel participation in any health care system or health insurance plan.Crowe insists that Obamacare violates Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution and "is therefore unconstitutional." He also feels that the president's plans violates the 10th Amendment among others.In addition to the proposed legislation nullifying any possible federal healthcare laws, Senator Crowe has asked Buddy Caldwell, the State Attorney General, to determine if, in his opinion, Obamacare would violate any state laws, the Constitution, or would pass onerous unfunded mandates on the state. (download .pdf of letter)Senator Crowe has been involved in many conservative projects including the 2009 State sovereignty resolution, a Tenth Amendment policy project. Also in 2009 Crowe introduced a resolution proclaiming April as "Abortion Recovery Awareness Month" which was signed by Governor Jindal. Crowe also became a signatory to AFP's No Climate Tax Pledge. (Crowe's committee assignments and associations can be seen at Project Vote Smart)Senator Crowe is part of an increasing push by state lawmakers to affirm state sovereignty and Tenth Amendment rights, laws that will likely come before the U.S. Supreme court in short order once Obamacare is passed in D.C. According to Michael Boldin's Tenth Amendment Center some 25 states have introduced state sovereignty resolutions or bills that would nullify federal laws that the state legislature feels violates their laws and those of the U.S. Constitution.(Hat tip LouisianaConservative.com) [...] […] Louisiana State Senator A.G. Crowe (R, Slidell) is introducing a bill for the 2010 legislative session in Baton Rouge that would make Obamacare illegal if it violates state laws, effectively making Obamacare null and void in the Pelican State.Senator Crowe states that his bill “provides that no law or rule shall compel, directly or indirectly, any person, employer or health care provider to participate in any health care system or health insurance.”Crowe’s proposed Senate Bill (download .pdf file) begins as follows:HEALTH CARE. Prohibits state or local governmental coercion of any Louisiana employer, health care provider, or individual to compel participation in any health care system or health insurance plan.Crowe insists that Obamacare violates Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution and “is therefore unconstitutional.” He also feels that the president’s plans violates the 10th Amendment among others.In addition to the proposed legislation nullifying any possible federal healthcare laws, Senator Crowe has asked Buddy Caldwell, the State Attorney General, to determine if, in his opinion, Obamacare would violate any state laws, the Constitution, or would pass onerous unfunded mandates on the state. (download .pdf of letter)Senator Crowe has been involved in many conservative projects including the 2009 State sovereignty resolution, a Tenth Amendment policy project. Also in 2009 Crowe introduced a resolution proclaiming April as “Abortion Recovery Awareness Month” which was signed by Governor Jindal. Crowe also became a signatory to AFP’s No Climate Tax Pledge. (Crowe’s committee assignments and associations can be seen at Project Vote Smart)Senator Crowe is part of an increasing push by state lawmakers to affirm state sovereignty and Tenth Amendment rights, laws that will likely come before the U.S. Supreme court in short order once Obamacare is passed in D.C. According to Michael Boldin’s Tenth Amendment Center some 25 states have introduced state sovereignty resolutions or bills that would nullify federal laws that the state legislature feels violates their laws and those of the U.S. Constitution.(Hat tip LouisianaConservative.com) […]

]]> Comment on Will Louisiana Be The First State To Tell The Feds “NO!”? by Louisiana Legislature Floating Bill Making Obamacare Illegal in State : Stop The ACLU http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=901#comment-16998 Louisiana Legislature Floating Bill Making Obamacare Illegal in State : Stop The ACLU Wed, 20 Jan 2010 18:14:40 +0000 http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=901#comment-16998 [...] (Hat tip LouisianaConservative.com) [...] […] (Hat tip LouisianaConservative.com) […]

]]> Comment on Will Louisiana Be The First State To Tell The Feds “NO!”? by The Reality Check » Blog Archive » Louisiana Legislature Floating Bill Making Obamacare Illegal in State http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=901#comment-16997 The Reality Check » Blog Archive » Louisiana Legislature Floating Bill Making Obamacare Illegal in State Wed, 20 Jan 2010 18:08:49 +0000 http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=901#comment-16997 [...] (Hat tip LouisianaConservative.com) [...] […] (Hat tip LouisianaConservative.com) […]

]]> Comment on The GOP Was Right, And So Was Michelle by jbs1717 http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=902#comment-16996 jbs1717 Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:22:36 +0000 http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=902#comment-16996 In the long run, obama will be the best thing to ever happen. It made people be active. Thank you obama. In the long run, obama will be the best thing to ever happen. It made people be active. Thank you obama.

]]> Comment on Will Louisiana Be The First State To Tell The Feds “NO!”? by jbs1717 http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=901#comment-16995 jbs1717 Mon, 18 Jan 2010 16:44:35 +0000 http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=901#comment-16995 Let's hope so. Let’s hope so.

]]> Comment on Barbrady Frank by jsanderssr http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=897#comment-16994 jsanderssr Fri, 15 Jan 2010 14:16:53 +0000 http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=897#comment-16994 Your characterization is grossly unfair to Officer Barbrady. bwawny fwank is an absolute pile of excrement and has no redeeming qualities. God knows we elect more than our share of clowns in Louisiana but nothing to match this lying, theiveing son of a dung eating dog. Your characterization is grossly unfair to Officer Barbrady. bwawny fwank is an absolute pile of excrement and has no redeeming qualities. God knows we elect more than our share of clowns in Louisiana but nothing to match this lying, theiveing son of a dung eating dog.

]]> Comment on Barbrady Frank by Twitter Trackbacks for Barbrady Frank | [louisianaconservative.com] on Topsy.com http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=897#comment-16993 Twitter Trackbacks for Barbrady Frank | [louisianaconservative.com] on Topsy.com Fri, 15 Jan 2010 04:36:23 +0000 http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=897#comment-16993 [...] Barbrady Frank | louisianaconservative.com/?p=897 – view page – cached + jbs1717: I remember that man saying that at the Reserve townhall meeting. The only problem is, we are a socialist... [...] […] Barbrady Frank | louisianaconservative.com/?p=897 – view page – cached + jbs1717: I remember that man saying that at the Reserve townhall meeting. The only problem is, we are a socialist… […]

]]> Comment on Barbrady Frank by stix1972 http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=897#comment-16992 stix1972 Thu, 14 Jan 2010 18:49:32 +0000 http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=897#comment-16992 I wonder if the cat also voted along with the Dallas Cowboys offensive line. I wonder if the cat also voted along with the Dallas Cowboys offensive line.

]]> Comment on A Cold Day In Hell? by jbs1717 http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=884#comment-16991 jbs1717 Sat, 02 Jan 2010 18:00:52 +0000 http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=884#comment-16991 I remember that man saying that at the Reserve townhall meeting. The only problem is, we are a socialist nation. We have regulations on top of regulations. We have welfare, social security, medicare, medicade, fannie mae and freddie mac, a communist taxing system, the military draft, unconstitutional wars, government giving money to private industries and foreign countries, a military presence in approximately 120 countries, Vermont has a socialist congressman, the list goes on and on, ad nauseum. Though I do appreciate the statement, he is about 150 years too late. I remember that man saying that at the Reserve townhall meeting. The only problem is, we are a socialist nation. We have regulations on top of regulations. We have welfare, social security, medicare, medicade, fannie mae and freddie mac, a communist taxing system, the military draft, unconstitutional wars, government giving money to private industries and foreign countries, a military presence in approximately 120 countries, Vermont has a socialist congressman, the list goes on and on, ad nauseum.

Though I do appreciate the statement, he is about 150 years too late.

]]> Comment on The Tolerant Left by jbs1717 http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=883#comment-16990 jbs1717 Thu, 31 Dec 2009 14:14:04 +0000 http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=883#comment-16990 Hope he gets well. Hope he gets well.

]]> Comment on Paying Attention to the Terrorists! by Twitted by unfatmatt http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=879#comment-16989 Twitted by unfatmatt Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:51:19 +0000 http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=879#comment-16989 [...] This post was Twitted by unfatmatt [...] […] This post was Twitted by unfatmatt […]

]]>