Another Wasted Vote

October 1, 2007

In May of 1995, I was in Denver, Colorado for a Republican Presidential forum, where all the Republican candidates were invited to speak. I remember that I went there very decided on Phil Graham, a guy who I thought had a real chance of winning.

Something caught my attention that day, the sound of keys jingling while one man gave his speech. That voice I heard on stage had passion, it was captivating. For the first time, I heard a speaker who I knew believed in everything that he was saying. I wouldn’t switch my vote because of this guy’s five minute speech, but I knew at that moment that I wanted to see a Phil Graham – Alan Keyes ticket. When Phil Graham dropped out, I voted for Alan Keyes and that was the first time I wasted my vote on a guy who couldn’t win.
[ad#Google Adsense]

I never regretted wasting my vote on Alan Keyes. I could have been like many of my Republican friends who had decided that they were going to vote for Bob Dole because Bob Dole could win, and we owed it to Bob Dole because of all his work he did for the Republican party. I appreciated all the work Bob Dole did, and I admire that this man, a war hero, over came being totally paralyzed from a war wound, but I didn’t owe him anything. At least I didn’t owe him my vote.

What Bob Dole did in the service he did because he had too, as do all of our men and women who serve. They didn’t do it for me, but rather for their loved ones back home who’s freedom would also be threatened if they did not go and fight. They do it because they love their parents, their spouses, and their children, not because one day little old Avman (that’s me) will vote for him for President someday. People who run for office ought to do it because they want to serve, not because we owe them something. And the sheer volume of people who served during a time of war makes it impossible to give the Presidency to somebody just because they served in the military during a time of war. Again, no disrespect to those who served is meant.

I get a strange feeling that we are faced with that same 1995-96 mentality in both parties. On one side, we have Hillary Clinton, who we seem to owe her the White House because her husband is Bill Clinton and she’s done so much for the Democrat party that they just kind of owe it to her. One the other side, we first had McCain who was a POW in Vietnam and since he was another longtime Senator, we just kind of owed it to him, especially since he lost in 2000, and now we have Giuliani. Well, he didn’t serve in Vietnam, but he was Mayor of New York City during 9-11. Despite the many other disagreements we as conservatives would have with this otherwise RINO Republican, we have those that feel like we owe it to him. Not me.

Though I appreciate Giuliani’s service to New York during such a tragic time, I want to know what other things Guiliani stands for. And I do feel bad for the suffering that John McCain had to endure because Vietnamese communist didn’t care about any war crimes reminiscent of Ghengis Khan that gets seared into people’s minds, I can’t, in good conscience, have that as the sole criteria as President. I owe them my respect, but I don’t owe them my vote. They did what they did so that I can have a choice when I vote, not so they can own my vote when they felt it was their time.

But I’m going to talk about my wasted vote. You see, I take my vote a lot more seriously than to cast it on the guy who I think I owe it the most to. I do not sell my vote to the guy who’s going to bring home the pork or who gives me the neatest handout. I take what they have done in their lives into account, but ultimately my vote gets cast for the guy who I think is going to lead us into a much better future. To me, it’s a wasted vote to do anything less.

For me, that guy that I am going to cast my vote for in this Presidential year is going to be Ron Paul. As crazy as it may seem to many of you, Ron Paul is the guy who I think will lead us in the right direction. He’s the guy who’s victory will shock both parties.

Do I agree with Ron Paul on every issue? I know I don’t agree with him on ending the war. There’s a few issues that I disagree with him I’m sure, but I also understand his point of view. His view on the war makes more sense than sticking a finger down ones throat and vomiting as a way to protest the war, or hugging and kissing on Hugo Chavez, or going to Iraq and playing checkers for peace with Saddam Hussein while we prepare for war.

Yes, some of his views are extreme, but wasn’t it Barry Goldwater who said “Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice”? What is extreme is risking your fortune, your life, even your family so that a nation can be independent and free. It took a great war in order for us to have independence and many more wars to keep our freedom. Over the last forty years we’ve become more than willing to surrender our freedom. Haven’t we become dependent enough on Government to provide for us? Haven’t we relied on government to solve all of our problems? Would you prefer thousands of cameras capable of tracking your every move, but incapable of solving crime, in order to feel safe? Would you prefer that we give up all of our freedom because our government says it’s necessary to defend our freedom?

For me, the answer is a resounding no. It’s not my liberty that I’m giving up for my own security. It’s the freedom of future generations that is lost, all for my desire to never die.

For me, Ron Paul represents an idea that I have long felt that we as a nation need to do, that is, to get back to the original intention of the United States Constitution. You know, it’s that document that we all claim to love, yet, the vast majority of us never reads it. It’s to move our nation away from this selfishness that eats away at the fabric of our society, the ideology that everybody owes me something, but I owe nothing back. It’s to give Freedom another chance because it’s worth it, after all, aren’t we fighting a war now because we’re trying to preserve freedom?

Will Ron Paul be able to end the war in Iraq, balance the budget, restore all Rights lost, and united the universe? Probably not, especially with congress fighting against his extremism. But what he can do is get our nation thinking about what it means to be a free nation, he can reignite our passion for the Constitution.

Congress will stop him, so I don’t fear him. In fact, how can I fear a guy who stands up for freedom and not fear the guy who wants to centralize power in an office that he’s seeking?

It’s far-fetched to think that Ron Paul can win this election, I know it, we all know it, so why even worry about how congress will handle it? While many of you will say that I’m wasting my vote on Ron Paul, I’d tell you that I’m utilizing my vote to empower a man who I believe can help educate the nation on the Constitution and keep the torch of liberty lit, at least for one more generation. For me, it would be a wasted vote to do otherwise.


12 comments
Jim from Gonzales
Jim from Gonzales

I will be voting for Ron Paul too. I think Ron Paul can win if enough people will listen and wake-up!

Pat H
Pat H

Ron Paul does not ignore terrorists, he just believes that they should be pursued with Letter of Marque and Reprisal, as specified in the Constitution, not by invading and occupying every country that may have terrorists present.

Mark
Mark

It’s not a wasted vote. I once thought the same way though. That a vote for someone that probably would not win but I believed in was a wasted vote. I once thought that everyone had to vote for someone that had a chance to win. I now know that this type of thinking is counter productive. Both party’s are two sides of the same coin. I’m voting for Ron Paul. It’s my duty as a true American.

Nick
Nick

70% of U.S. citizens think we ought to leave IRAQ, but not abandon the War on Terror completely. Ron Paul thinks we ought to completely disengage from confronting terrorism. Hell, I don't think he even supports hunting down Bin Laden.

Trent Hill
Trent Hill

Nick, What exactly made you lose respect for Paul? Because he doesnt want another 5000 lives lost so the Republican party can supposedly keep its "honor"? You shouldnt vote on the War, its a losing issue. 70% of US citizens think we ought to leave. So nominating a pro-stick-to-it candidate will only cause you to lose the election and forfeit NOT ONLY the War-issue, but all others. Might as well forfeit the war issue early on but get a peak at what limited government looks like. Because none of these other guys (Hunter included) have even a clue.

Luke Farrel
Luke Farrel

This post ultimately summarizes my thoughts on Ron Paul. I don't agree with everything he has to say, but he is miles ahead of all the others!

Nick
Nick

I used to have alot of respect for Ron Paul, and lost it about two televised debates ago.

Trent Hill
Trent Hill

Wow. Great job AVMAN. I've been reading this blog on and off for the past couple of months, now ill check in more often.

Dave
Dave

Your all over looking the BEST of the bunch....Tom Tancredo. He is a true conservative and the one I'll cast my vote and yes my money too. He was the first to ever call for securing our borders when no one else was even talking about. He will complete the war on terror and save us from the tax and spend Democrates. I strongly urge everyone to take a closer look at Tom and I think if your a true conservative you will want him to win. And he will if all get behind him. Try and think how a bad thing will be should the Clintons re-occupy the Whitehouse again and we don't have Newt to stop them!

JOSH
JOSH

THANKS FOR SENDING ME THIS LINK! I THINK YOU HAVE SOME VERY GOOD POINTS AND VIEWS! I SPEND MY HARD EARNED PEANUTS ON HIS CAMPAIGN HERE IN MONROE, LA... AND I THINK HE HAS A CHANCE! IF WE EDUCATE MORE PEOPLE ABOUT HIM THEN HE CAN GET MORE VOTES! IM DOING EVERYTHING IN MY POWER TO SEE HIM BECOME OUR NEXT PRESIDENT! GO RON PAUL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Chad
Chad

Don't be bullied by the Rockefeller Republicans who have high jacked our cause. I would rather see Ron Paul win the nomination and lose, than have any of the top tier candidates win. Like the failed presidential bid of Barry Goldwater in 1964, it would be a short term loss, but a long- term victory, in this man's opinion. It is said that Goldwater's failed bid launched the conservative movement.

Wayne Herrod
Wayne Herrod

Voted for someone who represents the ideals of this country and says what direction you want it to go in is NOT wasting your vote. Voting for yet another Faustian choice between two evils IS. By always holding ones nose and always choosing the lesser of two evils one will surely wind up with evil, by voting for hope, there is a chance it might someday be achieved. Wayne

Please help Louisiana Conservative Dot Com. Please donate $5, $10, or whatever you can afford to help our cause today!

Like Box