Response to Questions on “GUN CONTROL”!

January 28, 2013

By

 

 

Leon Puissegur

 

 

Gun Control is now a very heated debate but the ones screaming for the ban on certain weapons seem to fail to see the truth of the matter and that is that everyone of the mass murders being as horrible as they were have been done by people with Mental Health problems, but instead of creating tighter laws dealing with those with mental Health problems, our Senators, President, Vice president, Attorney General, Senators, and Representatives seem to like to not just violate their Oath of office, but also take action that is an act of Treason as so defined!

 

Treason;1. the betrayal of trust; 2. the offense of attempting by overt acts to overthrow the government of the state to which the offender owes allegiance or to kill or personally injure the sovereign or his family.

 

 

As one can clearly see, if an individual betrays the trust of their people that sent them totheir positions in government or if they use “overt” acts, in layman’s terms, “open’ acts, to overthrow the government.  Here we have to say that none of them seem to be trying to overthrow the Government, but they are in Fact trying to “change” the Constitution in particular the Second Amendment. It is the “opinion” that those, whom do Not support the Constitution or any Amendment thereof, are in fact people committing acts of treason by attempting to change our Constitution!

 

We have contacted Louisiana’s Representatives in the New Orleans area and found that only one in this area will not give a solid answer to either phone calls, (one of which the phone was slammed down, Senator Mary Landrieu’s office), or e-mail, or postings on their sites.

 

In response to our question of how Senator Mary Landrieu would vote on any sort of “Gun Control” all we got back from her is what is below. Senator Mary Landrieu is the only Senator we contacted from the State of Louisiana that refused to give a solid stand on this critical vote about the rights of legal Citizens under the Second Amendment.  Senator Mary Landrieu’s office actually hung up slamming the phone down when we questioned them about why she would not give a solid statement about the rights of legal Citizens under the Second Amendment.  All we received from Senator Mary Landrieu’s office was the standard form letter below!  Senator Mary Landrieu seems to be avoiding a very important question here and brings forth a question of how much money will she get this time if she votes “For” the Feinstein bill, (This is a matter of “opinion” based upon her obtaining money for an important vote on the “health care” issue.).

 

 

 

“Thank you for contacting my office. This automatic response confirms that I received your message, and I will respond to your concerns.

If you are writing about a problem you are having with a federal agency or other urgent concerns, please contact one of my state offices for immediate assistance. New Orleans: (504) 589-2427; Baton Rouge: (225) 389-0395; Lake Charles: (337) 436-6650; Shreveport: (318) 676-3085.

In case you are in the Washington, D.C., area in the near future and would like assistance in scheduling tours, please visit landrieu.senate.gov/tours.

Again, thank you for contacting me. Your participation in the democratic process makes our government work better and helps me make decisions that are best for Louisianians.

Sincerely,

Mary Landrieu

 

We did contact Representative Rodney Alexander by phone and his people stated that Representative Alexander supports the Second Amendment and would not support any sort of bills to restrict any legal Citizen from owning guns that are presently allowed to be owned.  Representatives Steve Scalise also responded in the same way, we did not try the other Representatives of the state, but we understand that they also hold the same feeling that the others feel and that is that they support the Constitution and the Second Amendment, and they also wonder why the President, Vice president, Attorney General, and Senators and representatives went after guns when the main and root of nearly all the mass murders were due to a person with a very bad Mental health problem.

 

 

Senator David Vitter’s office sent the reply below and it can be readily seen that Senator Vitter knows that any sort of  “Gun Control” will do nothing to stop the people with serious Mental Health problems from obtaining weapons of any sort to do harm to people.  This shows that of all our State officials, in Washington, D.C., only one, Senator Mary Landrieu seems willing to court the Obama line and continue doing what the people of Louisiana do NOT want!  Maybe next year when she goes for re-election, she will find herself out of work for her turncoat and acts of Treason to the people of Louisiana!

 

 

The following is from Senator David Vitter;

 

“In the wake of these tragedies, many in Washington are calling for increased restrictions on the right to keep and bear arms, arguing that it will help to reduce gun violence. For example, Senator Feinstein (D-CA) has announced plans to reintroduce a ban on assault weapons and to limit magazine capacity. Also, President Obama has signed 23 executive actions and has called on Congress to pass legislation, including background checks for all firearms sales. However, as many supporters of the Second Amendment have pointed out, increased restrictions do little to affect the actions of criminals, who by definition do not abide by the law. Instead, they restrict the rights of law-abiding Americans.

 

“I am a firm believer and ardent supporter of the rights enshrined in the Second Amendment. This constitutional right, and our heritage of using firearms for sporting and self-defense purposes, does not have to be sacrificed to reduce gun-related violence. Instead, we should focus on enforcing the extensive laws already in place and turn our attention to more appropriate measures, such as increasing the safety of our schools and keeping guns out of the hands of those who may be mentally incapable of owning them responsibly.”

 

 

Given Senator David Vitter’s response above we have to go into something that few are brave enough to mention let alone show.  This is where “WE THE PEOPLE” regain control of an out of control Congress and Executive branch!  The quotes below shown just why any restriction to the Constitution cannot be done without the making of an Amendment to the Constitution!

 

Unconstitutional Official Acts

16 Am Jur 2d, Sec 177 late 2d, Sec 256:

“The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land. The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statute, to be valid, must be In agreement. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid; one must prevail. This is succinctly stated as follows:

The General rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of it’s enactment and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.

Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it…..

A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law. Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the lend, it is superseded thereby.

No one Is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.

Jon Roland:

Strictly speaking, an unconstitutional statute is not a “law”, and should not be called a “law”, even if it is sustained by a court, for a finding that a statute or other official act is constitutional does not make it so, or confer any authority to anyone to enforce it.

All citizens and legal residents of the United States, by their presence on the territory of the United States, are subject to the militia duty, the duty of the social compact that creates the society, which requires that each, alone and in concert with others, not only obey the Constitution and constitutional official acts, but help enforce them, if necessary, at the risk of one’s life.

Any unconstitutional act of an official will at least be a violation of the oath of that official to execute the duties of his office, and therefore grounds for his removal from office. No official immunity or privileges of rank or position survive the commission of unlawful acts. If it violates the rights of individuals, it is also likely to be a crime, and the militia duty obligates anyone aware of such a violation to investigate it, gather evidence for a prosecution, make an arrest, and if necessary, seek an indictment from a grand jury, and if one is obtained, prosecute the offender in a court of law.”

 

 

Will we as a State allow the people we send to Washington, D.C. to turn against the majority of the people from our State and vote against the People’s wishes?  Keep in your memory that Senator Mary Landrieu did in Fact vote for Obama Care and got 300 million dollars for doing that, even though over 70% of the people in Louisiana did not want that!  Yes, remember this well and this comes just as Senator Mary Landrieu will be asking for those whom she Betrayed to vote for her!!!


Please help Louisiana Conservative Dot Com. Please donate $5, $10, or whatever you can afford to help our cause today!

Like Box