It seems that Senator Mary Landrieu has aligned herself with the so called, Obamanites of the Democratic Party. Senator Landrieu has ads run by the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee; (See – http://www.dscc.org/), which when looked up has President Obama right there dead in front saying “Stand with President Obama…” and that shows Senator Mary Landrieu is aligned with the very President whom has and will be costing many people in Louisiana more due to the “Obamacare” package, of which Senator Mary Landrieu accepted 300 million dollars to support and has stated that she would do it all over again if she had to, ignoring the 70+% of the people in Louisiana that said they did not want that problem called Obamacare!
Now we did notice some other things on the DSCC site that should make a normal person cringe due to the very ideology of this site seemingly being bent on giving away anything it does not have to give! The first article that pops up is the “Demand Republicans Raise the minimum Wage”, which will do nothing but make everything cost more not including the higher prices we already pay due to the high price of fuel! Fuel and energy is yet another problem with Senator Mary Landrieu, but we have shown just how Senator Mary Landrieu makes sure that her high spot on the Energy Committee really has no stature or power, by sending campaign money to those who vote against her on all the energy policies, i.e., Senator Sheehan, Senator Harry Reid, Senator Mark Begich, and the list goes on!
Now the second article is one that begs to question, it states, “Support Unemployment Benefits”. Now given this one has to wonder, why would anyone make such a statement if they were working hard to get jobs? One line of thinking here is that the Democrats just wish to keep those who vote for them on their chest to continue to feed from their breasts until they either die or the people wake up and realize that they are not being given anything and the Democrats are forcing them to accept just being plain lazy and not to even look for a job! Now if Senator Mary Landrieu was really true about what she says on energy, she would force a vote on the Keystone Pipeline, force a vote to build at least 50 new oil refineries, and last but most important of all, force a vote to drill in Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming where some 1.5 TRILLION barrels of recoverable oil just sits waiting to be brought to OUR markets! But here we can say without a doubt that Senator Mary Landrieu does not wish to do any of these things because if she truly did, she would not send 5,000 to 10,000 dollars of campaign money to those who vote AGAINST her! Just those votes would bring in THOUSANDS of well paying jobs and then there would be no need for Unemployment benefits because you could get a good job!
The next article really gets one to wonder why does the Democratic Party wish to do this? That article is, “Reverse Citizens United”. This brings to question the real intent of the Democrats and Senator Mary Landrieu whom sides with them on this issue. According to the Democrats, this law means that corporations and outside special interest groups can spend millions in elections without disclosure, according to them. But when one reads the brief description of what Citizens United won in court, it paints a much different picture of the facts! This shows without a doubt that the main reason that the Democrats want to do away with this law, is not because of the millions of dollars allowed. It is because they have no “Control” over how it is used and in this case it would be used to show the TRUTH, not what the Democrats want! To show the Facts, read the brief synopsis below on this case and if you have half a brain, you will understand that the Democrats want to “SILENCE” free speech during elections!
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. ___ (2010), (Docket No. 08-205), is a U.S. constitutional law case dealing with the regulation of campaign spending by corporations. The United States Supreme Court held that the First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting independent political expenditures by corporations. The principles articulated by the Supreme Court in the case have also been extended to labor unions and other associations.
In the case, the conservative lobbying group Citizens United wanted to air a film critical of Hillary Clinton and to advertise the film during television broadcasts in apparent violation of the 2002 Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (commonly known as the McCain–Feingold Act or “BCRA”). Section 203 of BCRA defined an “electioneering communication” as a broadcast, cable, or satellite communication that mentioned a candidate within 60 days of a general election or 30 days of a primary, and prohibited such expenditures by corporations and unions. The United States District Court for the District of Columbia held that §203 of BCRA applied and prohibited Citizens United from advertising the film Hillary: The Movie in broadcasts or paying to have it shown on television within 30 days of the 2008 Democratic primaries. The Supreme Court reversed this decision, striking down those provisions of BCRA that prohibited corporations (including nonprofit corporations) and unions from making independent expenditures and “electioneering communications”. The majority decision overruled Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce (1990) and partially overruled McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003). The Court, however, upheld requirements for public disclosure by sponsors of advertisements (BCRA §201 and §311). The case did not involve the federal ban on direct contributions from corporations or unions to candidate campaigns or political parties, which remain illegal in races for federal office.
- ^ Jump up to: a b “Summary Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (Docket No. 08-205)”. Cornell University School of Law.
- ^ Jump up to: a b c Liptak, Adam (2010-01-21). “Justices, 5–4, Reject Corporate Spending Limit”. New York Times.
- Jump up ^ Liptak, Adam (2009-08-29). “Supreme Court to Revisit ‘Hillary’ Documentary”. New York Times.
- Jump up ^ Hasen, Richard (2010-01-21). “Money Grubbers: The Supreme Court kills campaign finance reform”. Slate.
- Jump up ^ Carney, Eliza (2010-01-21). “Court Unlikely To Stop With Citizens United”. National Journal. Retrieved 2010-01-21.
This shows that the Democrats are very misleading in what they lay claim to and what the Supreme Court stated! One has to wonder why would they wish to do this when they swore an Oath of office to “Uphold the Constitution”? Could it be that if this case succeded as it did they could not “Control” what was said even if it was in relation to the “Freedom of Speech”?
The next article is one that we all hear about nearly every day and here again it is not what the Democrats wish for the “people” they lead to the watering trough to know the truth about. “Support Comprehensive Immigration Reform”. Thism is very misleading as most of the articles on this Democratic site are. Their real idea here is not so much about making immigration refomra true meaning, but rather a way for the Democratic Party to “Control” more voters that they will make by gicving citizenship to people who violated the law! Enough said about that!
The next article is one that seems to continue to spring into the light of day no matter who says it is not true. “Denounce the Republican War on Women”. Now this brings to mind a great number of questions but the most important one being why is it just a “Republican War on Women”? Are we really that stupid to forget that it was President Bill Clinton that made a mockery of one lady and that was before Monica Lenwinsky! Yes, they are rather quick to call out the Republican Party while their man in the White House abused women as though they were his toys!
Now let us get back to Senator Mary Landrieu, here we have laid out the Democrats ideology which seems to fall in line with a different type of United States that we grew up in, it seems to be on the lines of a Socialist ideology rather than a United Styates ideology! We cannot forget that Senator Mary Landrieu is a major part of this party that has seemd to wonder off course somewhere between 2000 and now. At one time the Democratic Party was the one to turn to for help, but now it is like they wish to keep the poor people poor and make the rich even richer! What makes this even more apalling is the fact that Senator Mary Landrieu, the lady who wishes to make everyone feel as though she is one of them, sits in her 2 million dollar home near Washington, D.C. and goes to work making well over 120,000 dollars a year with a retirement of nearly the same amount, is really the very “ELITE” person she speaks out against.
We have to state that Senator Mary Landrieu voted Against making English the National language, why did she do that? Senator Mary Landrieu has many more questions to answer than space would allow us to ask. It is time now to allow her to retire so she can go to work for the money people that have kept her in office all these years, she has not represented the people of Louisiana well. We can state that Senator Mary Landrieu has not helped many Veterans, we know of a few who asked for help from her office only to be turned away. Once again, the list is too extensive to show here!
Senator Mary Landrieu is one of those who makes millions while the people back in Louisiana struggle to get by each and every day! Senator Mary Landrieu wishes to make you think she supports the poor, all the while she sends campaign money to Senators who do not need it, like Senator Harry Reid, Senator Barbara Boxer, Senator Dianne Feinstein, and the others that vote Against her for the campaign money Senator Mary Landrieu sends to them, making her vote not worth the money she is paid! Wake up people of Louisiana, Senator mary Landrieu would love for you to keep paying for her 2 million dollar home and her trips, sorry we forgot about the 14 thousand dollars for a Retreat for her staff! Now is this really what you want to “Represent” you in Washington, D.C.?