Senator Mary Landrieu Just Who Does She Work For?

February 11, 2014

By

Leon Puissegur

Well this is different and many who begin to read this may laugh and joke about the fact that Senator Mary Landrieu works for the People of Louisiana. But, before we allow that to be said, let us look at what Senator Mary Landrieu has done many times.  Senator Mary Landrieu has come out and stated she supports drilling; the Keystone Pipeline, and drilling where oil lies, especially in Louisiana.  But her record is somewhat questionable because even if she does in fact Vote for oil, her vote is “nullified” by the very Senators that her Political Action Committee has provided funds for to help them get elected!  Yes you read that right and this is like a huge slap to the face of big named Oil Companies that donate to her Political Action Committee, (PAC) called, JAZZ PAC!

 

Let us begin by showing the names of these very Oil Companies Senator Mary Landrieu betrays each time she says she votes for their operations!  Let us begin with a company many will recognize.  First we see that Entergy has contributed some $6,500, Marathon Oil contributed some $5,500 to the PAC and some $500 as an individual, Murphy Oil contributed some $5,000, just to name a few of her contributors that should be up in arms to know that Senator Mary Landrieu has taken this money from them and lay claims that she supports oil while the very money they contribute to her is used by Senator Mary Landrieu’s JAZZ PAC to help elect Senators who Vote AGAINST Oil, the Keystone Pipeline, and drilling anywhere!

 

Senator Mary Landrieu’s JAZZ PAC has contributed some $181,500 to Federal Candidates, many read like a Who’s Who Against the oil industry, names like; Senator Robert Menedez who wrote a letter and had seven fellow Democrats sign the same letter last March “Opposing any bipartisan effort to expand drilling” as shown by Kimberly Strassel in her article written in The Wall Street Journal. Ms. Strassel stated;

 

“Of the eight signers, Florida’s Bill Nelson, Vermont’s Patrick Leahy, Illinois’s Dick Durbin, Maryland’s Ben Cardin: name an anti-oil and gas Democrat, and JAZZ PAC has helped them get elected.”

 

Now if the CEO of these oil companies that sent her money for her support were really concerned, they would retract any and all money from Senator Mary Landrieu because she has taken their money and supported the very people the oil companies are against!  How in the world can Senator Mary Landrieu allow such an action? But she has done this with the Second Amendment also!  Senator Mary Landrieu continually states that she is helping those poor people meanwhile she sends money to the Senators whom always wish to keep the poor poor and make sure they never move up because if they do, Senator Mary Landrieu and others like her will be exposed for what they really are, a bunch of Socialist thinking people not worried about their people back home, but worried about keeping the poor under their thumb with all the “free” stuff they can take from others!

 

Now let us take a quick look at just a few Senators that Senator Mary Landrieu has given money to so they could be elected to the Senate and vote “Against” what Senator Mary Landrieu says she supports!

 

Let us begin with a look at Senator  Russ Fiengold from Wisconsin, here below is how he voted and this shows that Senator Mary Landrieu sends money to those who Oppose what Senator Landrieu says she supports!

 

During his legislative career, Feingold voted:

  • in      favor of a 2003 bill to ban oil exploration in the Arctic National      Wildlife Refuge;
  • against      a 2007 proposal to permit natural gas exploration and extraction at least      fifty miles off the coast of Virginia;
  • in      favor of a 1993 amendment to reduce funding for ballistic-missile      defense programs;
  • against major tax-cut      proposals in 1999,      2000,      2000      (again), 2001,      2003,      2005,      and 2006;
  • in favor of a 2005      income-tax hike for individuals in the top tax bracket;
  • in      favor of a 2008 bill imposing a 25 percent tax on the “windfall      profits” of major oil companies;
  • against      the 2001 anti-terrorism measure known as the Patriot      Act (Feingold was the only U.S. senator to oppose the measure, in a      98-1 vote);
  • against      an October 2002 joint resolution to authorize the use of the U.S. Armed      Forces against Iraq;
  • against      a 2006 proposal to create military commissions to try unlawful enemy      combatants for war crimes they had committed against the U.S.;
  • in favor of separate      proposals (in 2006,      2007,      and again in 2007)      to impose an arbitrary timetable for the withdrawal of U.S. troops from      Iraq;
  • against      a 1995 amendment to make it easier for law-enforcement authorities to      wiretap roving terrorism suspects;
  • against      a 2006 proposal authorizing the FBI to conduct “roving wiretaps” and to      access certain business records, as well as to make most provisions of the      Patriot Act permanent;
  • in      favor of a 2008 amendment removing telecommunications companies’      immunity from the FISA      Amendments Act of 2008;
  • in      favor of the 2006 Immigration Reform Bill, which would have created a      path to citizenship for all illegal aliens who had resided in the      U.S. for at least five years;
  • against      a 2006 proposal to provide $1.8 billion for the construction of 370 miles      of triple-layered fencing and 461 miles of vehicle barriers along      America’s southwest border with Mexico;
  • against separate bills (in 2006      and 2008)      calling for the construction of 700 miles of fencing along the U.S.-Mexico      border, and for additional measures to stem the flow of illegal      immigration;
  • in      favor of a 2007 proposal to end the use of a point-based immigration      system, (i.e., a system that seeks to ensure that people with skills      that society needs are given preference for entry into the United      States);
  • in      favor of a 2007 bill to fund the REAL ID Act of 2005, which proposed      to set minimal security requirements for state driver licenses and      identification cards;
  • in      favor of affirmative-action policies awarding preferential treatment      to business enterprises owned by nonwhite minorities and women;
  • in      favor of a 1996 welfare-reform bill designed to move large numbers of      people off the welfare rolls and into paying jobs;
  • in      favor of a 1993 amendment banning the possession of certain      semiautomatic firearms;
  • against separate      proposals (in 2004      and 2005)      to ban lawsuits against gun manufacturers, distributors, dealers, and      importers for damages resulting from the misuse of their products by      others;
  • in      favor of a 1993 amendment to substitute life imprisonment for all      death-penalty provisions;
  • against separate bills (in 1995,      1996,      1997,      1998,      1999,      and 2003)      designed to ban the late-term procedure commonly known as “partial-birth      abortion”;
  • against      a 2004 proposal to make it an added criminal offense for someone to injure      or kill a fetus while carrying out a crime against a pregnant woman;      and
  • against      a 1996 bill defining marriage exclusively as a legal union between one man      and one woman as husband and wife.

Feingold has long advocated the implementation of socialized, government-run healthcare in America.

 

We have shown the votes Fiengold made in Bold that Oppose what Senator Landrieu says she supports! Let us make a note here that Senator Mary Landrieu gave Senator Russ Fiengold $5,000 for his campaign, now if Senator Mary Landrieu was truthful to her people in Louisiana, she would not give a penny to anyone that voted in Opposition to her!

Here we can see that Fiengold would make any vote by Senator Mary Landrieu , “Null and Void” before she even placed her vote!  Now let us continue on with the next Senator that Mary Landrieu gave money to for his campaign and how he voted.

 

This is how Senator Harry Reid from Nevada voted on key issues that “OPPOSED” what Senator Mary Landrieu voted on! It has to be noted that Senator Mary Landrieu’s JAZZ PAC gave $10,000 to Harry Reid for his re-election campaign!

 

On Budgetary and Tax issues, Reid has voted:

  • in      favor of the $825 billion economic-recovery package, or stimulus bill,      of 2009;
  • against      a 2011 bill calling for federal debt reduction by means of spending cuts      to government programs deemed ineffective by the Program Assessment Rating      Tool;
  • in      favor of a 2008 bill increasing the tax rate for people earning over      $1 million;
  • against      a 2007 bill to raise the estate-tax exemption to $5 million, reduce the      maximum estate-tax rate to 35%, and promote economic growth by extending      the lower tax rates on dividends and capital gains;
  • against      a 2006 bill making estate-tax cuts permanent;
  • against      a 2006 bill permanently repealing the estate tax;
  • against      a 2006 bill to retain reduced taxes on capital gains & dividends;
  • against      a 2005 bill extending the tax cuts on capital gains and dividends;
  • against      a 2003 bill for $350 billion in tax cuts over 11 years;
  • against      a 2000 bill to reduce taxes for married couples; and
  • against      a 1997 proposal for a balanced-budget constitutional amendment.

On Education-related issues, Reid has voted:

  • in favor      of a 2001 bill calling for the creation of a $2.4 billion federal program      designed to reduce class size by assisting states and local education      agencies in recruiting, hiring and training 100,000 new teachers, while      canceling an amendment that allowed parents with children at      under-performing schools to use public funding for private tutors;
  • against      a 2000 proposal to permit tax-free savings accounts of up to $2,000      (annually) per-child to be used for public or private school tuition or      other education-related expenses;
  • against      a 1999 bill that would have made it easier for states to implement school      vouchers and charter schools; and
  • against      a 1997 bill that would have permitted the use of school vouchers in      Washington, DC.

On Energy and Environmental issues, Reid has voted:

  • against      a 2011 climate-change bill barring the Environmental Protection Agency      from regulating the emissions of greenhouse gases including, among others,      water vapor and carbon dioxide;
  • against      a 2009 bill that would have prevented the Senate from considering “any      bill or amendment that includes a National energy tax increase which would      have widespread applicability on middle-income taxpayers”;
  • in      favor of a 2008 climate-change bill restricting U.S. greenhouse-gas      emissions regardless of whether China and India took similar measures;
  • in      favor of a 2007 bill requiring the government to factor possible      global-warming-related ramifications into federal project planning;
  • against      a 2007 proposal to permit natural gas exploration and extraction at least      fifty miles off the coast of Virginia;
  • in      favor of a 2005 bill to ban an oil-leasing program in Alaska’s ANWR      region;
  • in      favor of a 2005 bill mandating a 40% reduction in U.S. oil usage by      the year 2025;
  • in      favor of a 2003 bill to remove oil drilling in ANWR from a budget      bill; and
  • against      a 2002 proposal to permit oil drilling in ANWR.

On Election and Campaign-Finance issues, Reid has voted:

  • in      favor of separate bills (in 2007 and 2009) calling for the  provision of a U.S. House seat for the      District of Columbia;
  • against      a 2007 bill requiring voters to present a photo ID before casting their      ballots in federal elections;
  • in      favor of a 2002 campaign-finance-reform bill to ban “soft money”      contributions to national political parties, and to stop issue ads from      targeting specific candidates within 30 days of a primary or 60 days of a      general election; and
  • in      favor of a 1997 McCain-Feingold      overhaul of campaign finance regulations;

On Healthcare-related issues, Reid has voted:

  • in favor of the Patient      Protection & Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) in 2010;
  • in      favor of separate bills (in 2007 and 2009) expanding the Children’s      Health Insurance Program;
  • against      a bill limiting medical liability lawsuits to $250,000; and
  • in      favor of a 1996 bill restricting medical savings accounts.

On Immigration-related issues, Reid has voted:

  • in      favor of a 2006 bill allowing illegal aliens to participate in the      Social Security system;
  • in      favor of a 2006 bill giving guest workers a path to citizenship;
  • in      favor of the 2006 Immigration Reform Bill, which would have created a      pathway-to-citizenship for all illegal aliens who had been residing in the      U.S. for at least five years;
  • in      favor of the McCain-Kennedy      Immigration Reform Bill of 2007, which would have provided legal status      and a path-to-citizenship for some 12 to 20 million illegal immigrants      nationwide;
  • against      separate bills (in 2006      and 2008)      authorizing the construction of more than 700 miles of fencing along the      Mexican border; and
  • in      favor of a 2007 proposal to end the use of a point-based immigration      system, (i.e., a system that seeks to ensure that people with skills      that society needs are given preference for entry into the      United States).

On Employment-related issues, Reid has voted:

  • in favor      of a 2008 bill extending the maximum period for which one could collect      unemployment benefits from 39 weeks to 59 weeks; and
  • in favor      of a 2007 bill raising the minimum wage to $7.25 per hour.

On Military and Counter-Terrorism issues, Reid has voted:

  • in      favor of a 2008 amendment removing telecommunications companies’      immunity from the FISA      Amendments Act of 2008;
  • in favor of a 2007 proposal to      impose an arbitrary timetable for the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq;
  • against      a 2006 proposal to create military commissions to try unlawful enemy      combatants for war crimes they had committed against the U.S.;
  • in      favor of a 2006 proposal authorizing the FBI to conduct “roving      wiretaps” and to access certain business records, as well as to make most      provisions of the PATRIOT      Act permanent;
  • in      favor of an October 2002 joint resolution to authorize the use of      the U.S. Armed Forces against Iraq;
  • in      favor of a 1995 amendment to make it easier for law-enforcement      authorities to wiretap roving terrorism suspects;and
  • in      favor of a 1993 amendment to reduce funding for ballistic-missile      defense programs.

 

 

On Civil Rights issues, Reid has voted:

  • in      favor of affirmative-action policies awarding preferential treatment      to business enterprises owned by nonwhite minorities and women.

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=2282

 

Once again we can see that on some of the very same proposals that Senator Mary Landrieu may have voted for, was made “Null and Void” by the individual she sent money to for his reelection!

 

We could continue on for pages and pages showing this, but will close with one individual that Senator Mary Landrieu sent money to and this one by far is perhaps the most destructive type of person to “Support” since he is aligned with a “Socialist and anti-Semitic website!  Senator Mary Landrieu gave $5,000 to Senator Bill White of Texas and the following is but a small part of what he really is and why Senator Mary Landrieu needs to be sent packing!

 

Senator – Bill White

What is below is what this man thinks and does and he has obtained support from Senator Mary Landrieu!

  • “Editor and publisher of the      socialist,      anti-Semitic website Overthrow.com

 

A former Pravda columnist and a self-proclaimed anti-Semite, Bill White is the editor and publisher of the website Overthrow.com, whose visitor traffic is beginning to rival that of such mainstream political sites as “The Weekly Standard.” In short, Overthrow has managed to position itself as the new leader for the Red-Brown political alliance, and therefore demands serious consideration.

 

Often referred to as the “Third position,” as it is technically neither a politically-Left nor politically Right-wing movement, this new doctrinal synthesis, which is one of the fastest growing ideological movements on the political fringe, uses a brew of socialism, anti-Semitism, and anti-Americanism to unite extremist factions from both sides of the political spectrum. The “Red” of this emerging alliance refers to the anti-capitalists, anti-globalists, displaced Bolsheviks, and Far-Left Socialists who have struggled for political relevance since the death of communism, while the “Brown” represents the Brown-shirted thugs of the various neo-Nazi movements. Although for much of the twentieth century, the Reds and Browns were diametrically-opposed political organizations, their increasing marginalization has forced them into an alliance cemented through anti-Semitism.

Websites like Overthrow have provided the anti-Semitic foundation for this emerging Red-Brown consensus. The primary feature of Overthrow is Bill White’s Libertarian Socialist News (LSN) service, a collection of news reports handpicked by White and frequently drawn from a variety of biased, unreliable sources, including al-Jazeera, the Iranian Parliament, and www.iraqwwar.ru (though reports without sources are not uncommon). White insists that the stories posted to the LSN service represent “censored information”denied mainstream exposure because of politically subversive content. However, it seems more likely that LSN’s stories fail to receive broader circulation because the “news” being reported frequently consists of barely coherent anti-Semitic fantasies, or, even worse, mere fabrications that represent the wishful thinking of Bill White. For example, on April 10, 2003, White posted a news alert warning that, “The US is planning to destroy Tikrit—the entire city. Genocide for 250,000 people with these MOAB bombs and their less powerful counterparts.”He failed to provide a source for this update.

The sources Overthrow employs to provide the majority of its LSN updates reinforce the anti-Semitic ideology presently fueling the Red-Brown alliance. Even when White decides to employ a more mainstream source for his news reports, he frequently compromises the information by adding inaccurate or anti-Semitic commentary. Recently, White posted a piece from the National Review simply to grant himself a forum through which he could attack writer Jonah Goldberg as the “Pillsbury Jewboy,” denounce Senior Editor Michael Ledeen as a “Kike Secret Agent,” and propose renaming the publication “The Kike Review.”

Since there are essentially no verifiable facts, aside from insults and anti-Semitic slurs to support much of the “news” reported on Overthrow, LSN often serves as the premier breeding ground for some of the more colorful anti-Semitic conspiracy theories presently in public discourse. On Friday, April 11 2003, under the auspices of a “news” report, LSN, linking from TBRnews.org, reported that the “SEC launches a probe into Israeli 9/11 stock deals: Jews seemed to know attacks were coming.” Like every other anti-Semitic story posted on LSN, the report offers no verifiable sources for this information. The only factual information contained in the article is that the SEC is looking into suspicious stock activity before the 9/11 attacks. Nowhere in the article is it verified the SEC is investigating Israeli 9/11 stock transactions. The best evidence the article can provide for any such Israeli insider trading is the allegation that there has been “a great deal of talk about the insider trading of American stocks by certain Israeli groups both in Canada and Germany between August 26 and the Sept.11 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.”

As one of the leading sources of disinformation for the Red-Brown Alliance, Overthrow unquestionably carries a great deal of influence with the political fringe. Since it is highly likely that any outbreaks of political violence, or even domestic terrorism, will stem from the political extremes, any encouragement of violence by White or his LSN is potentially incendiary. On March 18, 2003, the top story of White’s Libertarian Socialist News wire proclaimed, “Flag Bashers Wanted: Send Your Photos Here.” The article, while professing that White “can’t encourage anyone to engage in such activity,” asks for his readership to send him any pictures of “flag waving faggot[s] getting their heads kicked in.” White also notes, “it would make his day” if one of these “flaggots” were any of the writers employed by Free Republic, National Review, Weekly Standard or WorldNetDaily.

White gives considerable attention to the idea of violence toward members of the Jewish community, as well as “flaggots,” the term he employs to deride patriots. Despite his insistence that he has never encouraged violence against Jews, on April 7, 2003, Overthrow carried the LSN news report, “Klansmen, Nazi Held in Rape of Jewish Spy,” with the note that White, “found this amusing.” The story, originally from the July 6, 1979, edition of the Philadelphia Journal documents how the head of the New Jersey Ku Klux Klan and the reputed leader of the Garden State Nazi Party violently assaulted, imprisoned, and repeatedly raped a twenty-year old woman from the Jewish Defense League. White apparently decided to re-run the article because, as he comments with the story, it offers “an idea on how to deal with hateful Zionist Jews.”

Despite White’s repeated claims that he has never advocated violence, his comments about raping Jewish women and bashing in the skulls of patriots paint quite a different picture. The likelihood of a particularly destructive act resulting from Overthrow’s aggressive provocations is only increased by the site’s extensive collection of manuals offering instruction on how to create pipe bombs, dry ice bombs, chemical explosive bottles, chemical fire bottles, Molotov cocktails, and E-Z pipe bombs. In the banned book section, White provides a link to the “Terrorist Handbook.”

Perhaps the greatest threat presented by Overthrow and the political Third position the site seems to represent is the growing indication that the Red-Brown consensus has begun to ally itself with the virulently anti-Semitic Muslim extremist movement. Many of the fringe organizations associated with the Third Position movement share three primary ideological affinities with Islamo-Fascist organizations such as the Taliban and al Qaeda: “A hatred of Jews who are seen in the traditional anti-Semitic caricature of running the world through secret conspiracies, a hatred of the U.S. government, seen as not just a global bully but also controlled by Jews. U.S. neo-nazis sometimes refer the administration in Washington, D.C. as the Zionist Occupational Government—ZOG, and finally, a desire to overthrow existing governments and replace then with monocultural nation states built around the idea of supremacist racial nationalism or supremacist religious nationalism or both mixed together.” Overthrow often reflects such ideological connections between the two groups, especially through the site’s continued support of Palestinian suicide bombers, which it likens to “anti-bodies fighting a cancer,” as well as LSN’s insinuations that either the United States Government or the Israelis, not Islamic Terrorists, were responsible for the September 11th tragedy.”

This profile was adapted from the article, “The Bottom of the Barrel,” written by Ryan O’Donnell and published by FrontPageMagazine.com on April 16, 2003.

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=764

 

Just this one individual has shown that Senator Mary Landrieu has not considered whom she sends money to for their campaigns, or does she?  Maybe she does support this type of Anti-American person for the Senate?  She gave $5,000 for his campaign and this needs to be questioned!  Once again, we could go on for pages showing what looks like a who’s who for the Socialist Party, the “Progressive Party’ (also linked to the Socialist Party) and the list goes on.  Now how in the world have the people of Louisiana been misled by Senator Mary Landrieu with her tossing money to these “Socialists” like they helped her when they do just the opposite?  None of them questioned Senator Mary Landrieu and her passing money to campaigns of people linked to Anti-Semitic, Socialist, and Communist Parties!  Now we have and we have shown just a very small part of an even wider link to these Anti- United States, Anti- Jewish and other groups.  Isn’t it time to get rid of Senator Mary Landrieu and her support for those who hate our nation?

 

 


0 comments

Please help Louisiana Conservative Dot Com. Please donate $5, $10, or whatever you can afford to help our cause today!

Like Box